Building a National Literature: The United States 1800-1890
Summary:
In the
early 1800’s critics and even Americans agreed that there was really no
presence of American literature. This
really made Americans unhappy. They were just looking at print culture in a
simplistic way when really there was print of different kinds in the
1800’s. Letters, public documents, and
newspapers really rose to the occasion of daily public reading.
Serving
both public purpose and private interest, newspapers proliferated at a dizzying
pace up and down the coast and deep into the western frontier. It circulated
very fast for the new nation.
The
boundaries of American journalism really expanded dramatically with the
production of the penny press. It took
concepts that were used in London and incorporated it into the New York Sun
later becoming the New York Herald, and the New York Tribune.
Comment:
I thought
that it was very interesting that in 1869, the British journalist Edward Dicey
characterized the American as a “newspaper-reading animal”. This was interesting to me because we adopted
a lot of British concepts for literature.
We used British books as our literature to read, and used their concepts
on presenting news to the masses with the use of periodicals. I think it is odd that Dicey would speak
negative of the newspaper when it really is just a product of the English
influence.
Question:
Where would
American literature be without the production of the newspaper? Would we eventually adopt our own American
literature or would we have continued to use British literature imported.
No comments:
Post a Comment